Appeal No. 1996-4135 Page 8
Application No. 08/346,325
For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the examiner
has not met the initial burden of presenting a case of prima
facie obviousness. Accordingly, we reverse the examiner’s
rejections.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 1-3, 5, 10, 11 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Okamoto or, in the alternative, Okamoto in
view of Davis, and claims 8, 9, 12 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007