Ex parte WAKELAND et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-4169                                                          
          Application 08/378,066                                                      



          control circuit and said host computer, respectively, and                   
          responsive to receipt of signals from said single input means               
          for directing said peripheral device control signals to said                
          independent control circuit for processing and for directing                
          said host computer data and control signals only to said host               
          computer for processing;                                                    
                    means connected between said independent control                  
          circuit and said peripheral device for transmitting control                 
          signals produced by said processing of said peripheral device               
          control signals by said independent control circuit to said                 
          peripheral device; and                                                      
                    wherein said independent control circuit is not                   
          subject to control by said host computer.                                   
                    The Examiner relies on the following references:                  
          Galbraith                      3,936,600         Feb.  3, 1976              
          Niimi                          4,184,400         Jan. 22, 1980              
          Kaiser et al. (Kaiser)         4,942,606         July 17, 1990              
          DeLaTorre                      5,088,378         Feb. 18, 1992              
          Raasch et al. (Raasch)         5,237,692         Aug. 17, 1993              
                    Claims 1 through 17, 19, 24 and 25 stand rejected                 
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Raasch in                  
          view of Galbraith.  Claims 9 through 17, 19 and 25 stand                    
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                   
          Raasch in view of Galbraith, further in view of Kaiser.  Claim              
          18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable              
          over Raasch in view of Galbraith and Kaiser, further in view                
          of Niimi.                                                                   
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007