THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEITH BALMER
____________
Appeal No. 96-4184
Application No. 08/159,3461
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
2, 4 through 11, 13 through 34, 36 through 42, 44 through 76
and 78 through 113. In an Amendment After Final (paper number
7), claims 1, 10, 34, 41, 42, 49, 68 and 76 were amended. As
1Application for patent filed November 30, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007