THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JOE S. O'CONNER
________________
Appeal No. 97-0425
Application 08/330,3351
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and RUGGIERO, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-33. An
1Application for patent filed February 5, 1993.
According to appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/793,023, filed November 15, 1991, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007