Ex parte O'CONNER - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-0425                                                          
          Application 08/330,335                                                      


          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Merlo et al. (Merlo)          3,176,294          Mar. 30, 1965              
          Flannery et al. (Flannery)    3,778,826          Dec. 11, 1973              
          Gabbitas                      4,200,870          Apr. 29, 1980              
          Fritzlen et al. (Fritzlen)    4,231,039          Oct. 28, 1980              
          Raudonat et al. (Raudonat), “Multiple-Target FM-CW Radar For                
          Unambiguous Determination Of Distance and Speed”                            
          [translation], Nachrichtentech. Z., Vol. 30, No. 3, March                   
          1977, pages 255-260.                                                        
          The following rejections have been made:                                    
          1. Claims 17-25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                        
          as being unpatentable over Flannery in view of Raudonat and                 
          Merlo.                                                                      
          2. Claims 11-14 and 26-30 stand rejected under 35                           
          U.S.C.   § 103 as being unpatentable over Flannery in view of               
          Merlo.                                                                      
          3. Claims 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                        
          103 as being unpatentable over Flannery in view of Merlo and                
          further in view of Fritzlen.                                                
          4. Claims 1-3 and 6-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                        
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Gabbitas in view of Flannery               
          and Merlo.                                                                  
          5. Claims 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                      
          as being unpatentable over Gabbitas in view of Flannery and                 
                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007