THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JAMES LIOU and THEODORE W. HOUSTON
________________
Appeal No. 97-0557
Application 08/371,0401
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
1Application for patent filed January 10, 1995.
According to Appellants, the application is a continuation of
application 08/186,215, filed January 24, 1994, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 08/015,874, filed
February 3, 1993, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
application 07/825,743, filed January 23, 1992, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 07/358,298, filed May
26, 1989, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007