Ex parte SIVERS - Page 6



               1Application for patent filed June 07, 1995. According to               
          the appellant, this application is a continuation o                          
          08/405,396, filed March 15, 1995, w07/991,050, filed December                
          15, 1992.                                                                    
          discloses, expressly or under principles of inherency, each                  
          and every element of a claimed invention."  RCA Corp. v.                     
          Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221                 
          USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228               
          (1984), citing Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 713 F.2d 760,                 
          772, 218 USPQ 781, 789 (Fed. Cir. 1983).                                     
               Heuscher [B] uses interpolation with a single detector                  
          array for views collected over more than two revolutions of                  
          the spiral path.  On the other hand, Appellant claims                        
          interpolation on data from two detector arrays irrespective of               
          any revolutions.  Also, although Heuscher [B] discloses a                    
          multiple detector array embodiment, the detector arrays are                  
          summed, averaged, or the like (column 13, lines 8-10), not                   
          interpolated.                                                                







               Appellant cites several portions of Heuscher [B] to                     
          evidence this distinction.  Appellant argues on page 13 of the               

                                          6                                            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007