Appeal No. 1997-1022 Page 3
Application No. 08/368,359
BACKGROUND
The appellant's invention relates to a clothing insert.
An understanding of the invention can be derived from a
reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in the appendix to
the appellant's brief.
The prior art references of record (i.e., the applied
prior art) relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the
appealed claims are:
Mann 3,619,819 Nov.
16, 1971
Oram 5,388,275 Feb.
14, 1995
(filed Oct. 19, 1992)
Moretz et al. 5,392,467 Feb. 28,
1995
(Moretz) (filed Apr. 15, 1993)
Claims 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 through 9 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Oram in view of
Mann.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007