Ex parte SHIGEYOSHI - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1997-1185                                                        
          Application No. 08/497,845                                                  

          lines 7 and 8 (all independent claims of this application).                 
          This difference is used to calculate the additional time delay              
          added to the clock net.  Hooper and Hitchcock adjust time                   
          delays by changing circuit components, without changes to the               
          clock net.  Note Hitchcock, where it states:                                
                         From Fig.2, one can observe a funneling of                   
               negative slack values through block BA.  If BA could                   
               be replaced by a circuit having a smaller delay, all                   
               the negative slacks could be eliminated without                        
               changing functional design at all.  (Page 102, right                   
               column, second full paragraph.)  (Emphasis added.)                     
                    Similarly, Hooper states in the abstract:                         
                         The timing debt can be used as a criterion                   
               to determine when the implementation of circuit                        
               component should be changed.  (Emphasis added.)                        
                    Although the Examiner has noted instances of using                
          delay in the clock net (e.g., Hooper, column 5,lines 31-47),                
          the claimed calculation recited supra, using the worst delay                
          time margin and the secondary worst delay time margin, is not               
          disclosed or suggested by the references.                                   
                    The Federal Circuit states that "[t]he mere fact                  
          that the prior art may be modified in the manner suggested by               
          the Examiner does not make the modification obvious unless the              
          prior art suggested the desirability of the modification."                  


                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007