THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JUERGEN THOMAS, PETER SCHREYER, KNUT OPPENLAENDER,
WOLFGANG GUENTHER and LOTHAR FRANZ,
_____________
Appeal 97-1554
Application 08/495,5931
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Application for patent filed 2 August 1995. Applicants claim the benefit of the1
filing date of PCT/EP94/00722, filed 9 March 1994 and German patent application P 43 09
074.5, filed 20 March 1993. The real party in interest is BASF Aktiengesellschaft.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007