THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte EVERETT A. WESTERMAN
and PHILLIP E. ROLL
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0531
Application 08/464,4891
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 11, 12 and 25-28. As a result of further
1Application for patent filed June 5, 1995. According to
the appellants, the application is a division of Application
08/018,466, filed February 16, 1993, now Patent No. 5,442,156,
issued August 15, 1995; which is a continuation of Application
07/682,637, filed April 9, 1991, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007