Ex parte BAILEY et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 98-1022                                                          
          Application 08/380,796                                                      


          rejection of claims 27, 29-31, 37-39 and 42.  Claims 32-36                  
          have been objected to as depending from rejected claims and                 
          indicated as being allowable if rewritten in independent form               
          to include the limitations of the claims from which they                    
          depend.  Claims 41 and 43-47, the only other claims pending in              
          the application, have been allowed.                                         
               Appellants’ invention pertains to a module for a low                   
          volume waste handling system (claims 27, 29, 30 and 31), and                
          to a rotational molded or blow molded vacuum tank therefor                  
          (claims 37-39 and 42).  Independent claims 27 and 37 are                    
          illustrative of the appealed subject matter and read as                     
          follows:                                                                    
               27.  An integral module for a low volume human waste                   
          handling system comprising a vacuum tank and a vacuum pump,                 
          the vacuum pump having an inlet directly connected to an                    
          outlet from said vacuum tank; said vacuum tank of rotational                
          molded or blow molded plastic having flat walls, said flat                  
          walls having no continuous flat surface of greater than about               
          80 square inches in area.                                                   
               37.  A rotational molded or blow molded vacuum tank of                 
          plastic having flat walls, said flat walls having no                        
          continuous flat surface of greater than about 80 square inches              
          in area.                                                                    
               The single reference of record relied upon by the                      
          examiner in support of the rejection is:                                    

                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007