Ex parte BROGER et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1998-1562                                      Page 12           
          Application No. 08/611,416                                                  


          be read into the claims from the specification.  In re Van                  
          Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 1184, 26 USPQ2d 1057, 1059 (Fed. Cir.                 
          1993) citing In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321, 13 USPQ2d 1320,                
          1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989).  The pertinent definition of "lap" from              
          Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, (1979) is "a doubling or               
          layering of a flexible substance (as fibers or paper)."  It is              
          our determination that the broadest reasonable interpretation               
          one of ordinary skill in the art would give to "lap processing              
          machine" consistent with the specification is a machine that                
          processes laps unwound from a roll thereof.  It is appropriate              
          in our view to consider                                                     
          (1) Johannsson's cores 18 with paper webs wound thereon to be               
          "lap rolls," and (2) Johannsson's processing machine to which               
          the unwound paper web 19 is led by funnel 28 to be "a lap                   
          processing machine."                                                        


               For the reasons stated above, the decision of the                      
          examiner to reject claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is                      
          affirmed.                                                                   










Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007