Ex parte BROGER et al. - Page 17




          Appeal No. 1998-1562                                      Page 17           
          Application No. 08/611,416                                                  


          reasonably be expected to draw therefrom.  In re Preda, 401                 
          F.2d 825, 826, 159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968).                               


               In this case, after considering the collective teachings               
          of Eichenberger and Johannsson, it is our opinion that it                   
          would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at              
          the time of the appellants' invention to have modified                      
          Eichenberger's transport truck 1 by replacing pivoting                      
          receiving device 6 with  a flap operated by a piston and                    
          cylinder unit as taught by Johannsson, to supply rolls to the               
          working position in Eichenberger's lap processing machine.  In              
          this instance, it is our view that simplified feeding of                    
          reserve rolls to the working position taught by Johannsson                  
          would have provided the necessary motivation for one of                     
          ordinary skill in the art to have modified Eichenberger's                   
          apparatus.                                                                  


               Thus, the combined teachings of Eichenberger and                       
          Johannsson would have suggested connecting a piston and                     
          cylinder unit to cause the pivoting of Eichenberger's                       
          receiving device 6 and to locate the reserve position at a                  







Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007