Ex parte STOY et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1999-0072                                                                                                                   
                 Application 08/692,466                                                                                                                 


                 application.   We reverse and remand the application to the2                                                                                                                
                 examiner for further consideration.                                                                                                    


                          The invention relates to                                                                                                      
                          two-phase fluid flow systems used in industrial                                                                               
                          applications such as the steam flooding of oil                                                                                
                          fields or fluid distribution systems used in oil                                                                              
                          refineries, factories or the like.  More                                                                                      
                          particularly, the invention relates to methods and                                                                            
                          apparatus for measuring and controlling                                                                                       
                          quantitatively in response to the measurements, the                                                                           
                          vapor/liquid mixture ratio (steam quality) at piping                                                                          
                          junctions in such fluid flow systems [specification,                                                                          
                          page 1].                                                                                                                      
                          Inasmuch as the copies of claims 1 through 12 appearing                                                                       
                 in the appendix to the appellants’ brief (Paper No. 13)                                                                                
                 contain numerous inaccuracies over and above those noted on                                                                            
                 page 3 in the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 14), we have                                                                                
                 referred to the claims as they are officially entered into the                                                                         
                 record in reviewing the appealed rejection.                                                                                            
                          The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                                                                     
                 obviousness are:                                                                                                                       
                 Nogami                                       3,438,385                           Apr.  15, 1969                                        
                 Statler                                      5,146,941                           Sept. 15, 1992                                        
                 Stoy              et al. (Stoy)                       5,415,195                           May   16, 1995                               

                          2Claim 4 has been amended subsequent to final rejection.                                                                      
                                                                         -2-                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007