THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RYUICHI OKASHITA and NAOYASU SUGIMOTO
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0279
Application No. 08/926,9861
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 3 through 5, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed September 10, 1997.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 08/669,825, filed June 26, 1996, now
abandoned, which was a continuation of Application No.
08/360,060, filed December 20, 1994, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007