THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LARRY J. STEELEY
____________
Appeal No. 99-0633
Application No. 08/880,2471
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 19, which are all of the
claims pending in this application.
We AFFIRM.
BACKGROUND
1 Application for patent filed June 23, 1997. According to the
appellant, the application is a continuation of Application No. 08/613,505,
filed March 11, 1996, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 08/337,730, filed November 14, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No.
5,577,403; which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 29/006,161,
filed March 22, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. Des. 352,600.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007