THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION8
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT GISH
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-0931
Application 08/772,8611
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1, 3 through 11, and 13
through 20, all of the claims remaining in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to an apparatus for sizing
1 Application for patent filed December 26, 1996. According to appellant, this
application is a continuation of Application 08/450,015, filed May 25, 1995, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007