Ex parte MUTCHNICK - Page 6




              Appeal No.  1999-1236                                                                                      
              Application 07/571,782                                                                                     















                     From Table 1 in Nevens, it can be seen that all patients 1 through 7 are classified                 
              as “decompensated.”  However, not all of patients 1 through 7 have all of the symptoms or                  
              criteria used in that study to define “decompensated.”  For example, patient number 5                      
              lacks the presence of ascites, only patient number 1 has spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,                
              patients 5 and 6 lack hypersplenism or splenomegaly, and patients 1-4 and 6 lack                           
              encephalopathy.  From this information, it can be seen that all of the patients included in                
              the research study were considered as having “decompensated” liver disease; however,                       
              not all of these patients were clinically the same in terms of the parameters used to define               
              “decompensated.”                                                                                           




                     In another prior art research study by Dimopoulou (made of record in Paper No.                      
              15), patients with decompensated liver disease were also treated with interferon alfa-2b.                  

                                                            6                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007