Ex parte QUANDT - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1999-2364                                                        
          Application No. 08/562,816                                                  


          rather are located part of the way down the side of the top                 
          sheet at fold line 13, leaving the upper end 14 of the top                  
          sheet free to be folded back at line 13.                                    
               Although not argued by appellant, we note that North also              
          does not meet the requirement of claim 1 that there be "a                   
          first connection between said top and bottom sheets along                   
          substantially the entire length of said first side edge of                  
          said top sheet," because the connection (seam 3) between                    
          North’s top and bottom sheets is not along "substantially the               
          entire length" of a side edge of top sheet 2.                               
               We therefore will not sustain rejection (1) of claim 1,                
          nor, it follows, of dependent claims 5 and 7.                               
          Rejection (2)                                                               
               With regard to claims 2, 3 and 10, the Schuetze and Hoss               
          references do not render obvious the above-noted differences                
          between parent claim 1 and North’s disclosure.  Rejection (2)               
          therefore will not be sustained as to those claims.                         







                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007