Appeal No. 2000-0408 Application No. 08/917,480 Page 6 Since all the limitations of claims 1-20 are not disclosed by Ashkenas for the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed. REMAND We remand this application to the examiner to consider the patentability of claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the cited prior art. In addition, the examiner should consider searching for other prior art1 that would teach how the control surfaces along a wing's trailing edge should be set for different flight conditions (e.g., take-off, landing, cruising, pitching). 1 The examiner may wish to consider computer-based flight management systems, aircraft operating manuals, and pilot operating handbooks.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007