Ex parte AURIOL et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-1473                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/765,169                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to a device for                      
          distributing parts singly.  A copy of the claims under appeal               
          is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                      


               Claims 14 to 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                  
          first paragraph, as containing subject matter which was not                 
          described in the specification in such a way as to enable one               
          skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is                
          most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention.                    


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted                
          rejection, we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 16,                   
          mailed January 12, 2000) for the examiner's complete reasoning              
          in support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 15,                
          filed December 27, 1999) and reply brief (Paper No. 17, filed               
          February 16, 2000) for the appellants' arguments thereagainst.              


                                       OPINION                                        









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007