THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NAOKI IKEDA, MASAFUMI YOSHIMURA,
KAZUAKI MIZOGUCHI, HIROSHI KITAGAWA,
YUJI KAWASHIMA, KIYOSHI SADAMITSU
and YASUYUKI KAWAHARA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1372
Application No. 08/003,6591
____________
HEARD: June 10, 1999
____________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1 through 10 and 12 through 22, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Claims 1, 21
and 22 are illustrative and a copy of these claims are appended to this decision.
Application for patent filed January 13, 1993.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007