THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KOJI AKIOKA, TATSUYA SHIMODA,
TOSHIYUKI ISHIBASHI, RYUICHI OZAKI,
and OSAMU KOBAYASHI
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1777
Application No. 08/034,009
____________
HEARD: February 10, 2000
____________
Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 1 through 24, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
BACKGROUND
The appellants’ invention relates to a process of
preparing a permanent magnet and product thereof. An
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007