Ex parte AKIOKA et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1996-1777                                       Page 7           
          Application No. 08/034,009                                                  

          claimed product herein with all of its attendant properties                 
          would have been obvious within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          from the disclosure of copper as one of several possible                    
          coercive force enhancing elements that may have been selected               
          for use as a magnetic alloy additive therein.  Accordingly, we              
          will not sustain the examiner's stated rejections.                          
                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject                   
          claims 1-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                
          Akioka '241; claim 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated               
          by,                                                                         

























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007