THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SNEHAL M. SHAH
__________
Appeal No. 1996-2731
Application 08/240,862
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SPIEGEL, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 3-6, 8, 9,
12, 13, 17, 18 and 21-23, all the claims pending in the application. Claim 21 is
representative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007