Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte SCHWARTZKOPF et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2000 > Ex parte SCHWARTZKOPF et al. - Page 1

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today         
                    (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and          
                          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                  

                                                                 Paper No. 36         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                   Ex parte GEORGE SCHWARTZKOPF and GEETHA SURENDRAN                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1996-2734                                 
                              Application No. 08/133,680                              
                                     ____________                                     
                               HEARD: December 07, 2000                               
                                     ____________                                     
          Before KIMLIN, JOHN SMITH, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal               
          to allow claims 15-19 as amended after final rejection. Claims              
          13, 20 and 21, which are all of the remaining claims pending                
          in this application have been indicated as being allowable by               
          the examiner.                                                               
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants' invention relates to an alkaline-containing                
          photoresist stripping composition that includes a specified                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007