The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GEORGE SCHWARTZKOPF and GEETHA SURENDRAN
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2734
Application No. 08/133,680
____________
HEARD: December 07, 2000
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN SMITH, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 15-19 as amended after final rejection. Claims
13, 20 and 21, which are all of the remaining claims pending
in this application have been indicated as being allowable by
the examiner.
BACKGROUND
Appellants' invention relates to an alkaline-containing
photoresist stripping composition that includes a specified
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007