Ex parte HOLLENBERG et al. - Page 2




                   Appeal No. 1996-2960                                                                                                                             
                   Application 08/192,027                                                                                                                           


                            Claims 1 and 14 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are reproduced                                                     
                   below:                                                                                                                                           
                            1.        A tissue comprising two or more plies and thereby having two or more                                                          
                   internal ply surfaces, two of said plies being outer plies, wherein one or more of said                                                          
                   internal surfaces contains a colored or patterned indicia which is visible through at least                                                      
                   one of said outer plies.                                                                                                                         
                            14.       A three-ply facial tissue comprising two outer tissue plies and an inner tissue                                               
                   ply crimped together at the edges of the plies, said inner ply containing a virucide and a                                                       
                   colored or patterned indicia which is visible through both outer plies.                                                                          
                                                  1                                                                                                                 
                            The references  relied upon by the examiner are:                                                                                        
                   Brown                                           2,143,682                              Jan. 10, 1939                                             
                   Holbein et al. (Holbein)                        4,504,357                              Mar. 12, 1985                                             
                   Amano et al. (Amano)                            63-270896                              Nov.   8, 1988                                            
                   (Japanese Patent)                                                                                                                                

                                                                 Ground of Rejections                                                                               

                            Claims 1-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                                                                       
                   obviousness, the examiner relies upon Holbein, Brown, Amano, and the admitted state of                                                           
                   the prior art from the specification.                                                                                                            
                            We reverse.                                                                                                                             




                            1The examiner has additionally listed British Patent 1,268,262 to Barfred in the                                                        
                   Examiner's Answer at page 2.  We find no other mention of Barfred or any indication that                                                         
                   the examiner intends to rely on this document in this appeal.  Therefore, we have not                                                            
                   considered this reference in this appeal.                                                                                                        
                                                                                 2                                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007