Ex parte FUJIMORI et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
          for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.

                                                               Paper No. 40           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
              Ex parte NAOMI FUJIMORI, AKIHIKO IKEGAYA, TAKAHIRO IMAI,                
                         NOBUHIRO OTA and TAKAYUKI SHIBATA                            
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1996-3121                                  
                             Application No. 08/115,783                               
                                    ____________                                      
                              HEARD:  February 23, 2000                               
                                    ____________                                      
          Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and WARREN, Administrative                    
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                 


                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                 
          final rejection of claims 1, 3-9, and 13-15.                                
               Appealed claims 1 and 13 are representative and are                    
          reproduced below:                                                           
               1.        A method for producing diamond by a CVD method               
          comprising:                                                                 







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007