The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte AKIHIKO MARUYAMA,
TATSURO FUJIO, and SADAO TESHIBA
__________
Appeal No. 1997-1307
Application No. 08/014,012
__________
HEARD: October 10, 2000
__________
Before WINTERS, ROBINSON, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 15-18 and 20-24 all the claims pending in the application.
Claims 1-9 were canceled in appellants’ amendment and response under 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.111.1 Claims 10-14 and 19 were canceled, and claims 23 and 24 were added
in appellants’ amendment under 37 C.F.R. § 1.116.2 These amendments were
entered into the record. However, appellants’ amendments under 37 C.F.R. §
1.193(b)3 were not entered into the record.
1 January 28, 1994, Paper No. 14.
2 November 2, 1994, Paper No. 19.
3 Filed June 28, 1995, Paper No. 25, and November 20, 1995, Paper No. 30.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007