THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SATWINDER MALHI
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1624
Application No. 08/384,8161
____________
ON BRIEF2
____________
Before THOMAS, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 19 through 25, which are all of the claims
pending in this application. In the Examiner's Answer, the
1Application for patent filed February 6, 1995. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application 08/187,570, filed
January 26, 1994, now abandoned, which is a division of Application
07/559,756, filed July 30, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,294,559.
2We observe that on November 12, 1999 (paper no. 24), appellant filed a
waiver of the oral hearing set for December 6, 1999.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007