THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VISHAL MARKANDEY and ROBERT J. GOVE
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1981
Application No. 08/298,5471
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
2
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-6 , which
are all of the claims pending in this application.
We AFFIRM.
1Application for patent filed August 30, 1994.
2The examiner indicates on page 1 of the answer that claims 2-4 are now allowable over the prior
art of record and withdrew the rejection of these claims leaving only claims 1, 5 and 6 rejected.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007