Ex parte CHAPMAN et al. - Page 8




             Appeal No. 1997-2271                                                                                 
             Application 08/588,969                                                                               


             phenyl nucleus function to form a chelate (answer, pages 15-                                         
             16), but has not explained why the disclosures in Komamura                                           
             ‘092, Bailey and                                                                                     
             Komamura ‘422 of using an alkoxy group at the 2-position in                                          
             imaging systems which, as discussed above, are different from                                        
             that of Kovacs, would have fairly suggested, to one of                                               
             ordinary skill in the art, the desirability of substituting an                                       
             alkoxy group for the oxygen atom at the 2-position of the                                            
             phenyl nucleus of Kovacs’ dye.                                                                       
                    The examiner, therefore, has not carried the burden of                                        
             establishing a prima facie case of obviousness.  Consequently,                                       
             we reverse the examiner’s rejection.                                                                 
                    Since no prima facie case of obviousness has been                                             
             established, we need not address the experimental results.                                           
             See                                                                                                  




             In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785, 788 (Fed.                                         
             Cir. 1984); In re Rinehart, 531 F.2d 1048, 1052, 189 USPQ 143,                                       
             147 (CCPA 1976).                                                                                     

                                                      -8-8                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007