Ex parte MATTSSON et al. - Page 4





                     Appeal No. 1997-2795                                                                                                                                              
                     Application No. 08/438,933                                                                                                                                        



                                                                                     ISSUES3                                                                                           

                                Claims 14 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as indefinite.                                                                

                     Claims 12 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under                                                             

                     35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over any of Naggi ‘063, Naggi ‘881 or Petitou.  Claims 13-16                                                                

                     stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over either Fransson (M) or Casu.  We                                                                  

                     REVERSE.                                                                                                                                                          

                                In reaching our decision in this appeal we have given careful consideration to the appellants’                                                         

                     specification and claims and to the respective positions articulated by the appellants and the examiner.                                                          

                     We make reference to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 9, mailed December 13, 1996) for the                                                                        

                     examiner’s reasoning in support of the rejections and to the appellants’ brief (Paper No. 8, filed                                                                

                     October 7, 1996) for the appellants’ arguments thereagainst.                                                                                                      






                                3According to the Advisory Action mailed August 29, 1996 (Paper No. 6), cancellation of claims 8-11 in the                                             
                     amendment filed August 20, 1996 (Paper No. 4) overcame the final rejection these claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                                                    
                     second paragraph, as indefinite for lack of proper antecedent basis and under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                                               
                     over Naggi ‘063, Naggi ‘881, Petitou, Conti (U.S. Patent No. 5,164,378, issued Nov. 17, 1992 and filed Nov. 26, 1990) or                                          
                     Herr (U.S. Patent No. 4,966,894 issued Oct. 30, 1990).                                                                                                            
                                According to the examiner’s answer, “[a]ll rejections based on HERR et al. (C), CONTI et al.(E),                                                       
                     FRANSSON et al. (L and N) are hereby withdrawn, and are therefore not at issue” (Paper No. 9, page 2).   Thus, the                                                
                     final rejection of (i) claims 12 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C.                                           
                     § 103 as being unpatentable over Conti or Herr and (ii) of claims 13-16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                                               
                     over Fransson (K) (i.e., 62 Carbohydrate Research 235-244 (1978), Fransson et al. (L) (i.e., 97 FEBS Letters 1,                                                   
                     119-123 (1979), or Fransson et al. (N) (i.e., 106 European Journal of Biochemistry 59-59 (1980)) have been withdrawn.                                             

                                                                                        - 4 -                                                                                          






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007