Ex parte TSERNG et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1997-3484                                                        
          Application 08/089,359                                                      

          Accordingly, the Examiner has failed to provide sufficient                  
          evidence to support a prima facie case of obviousness.                      
               For the reasons stated above, the anticipation and                     
          obviousness rejections of claims 1 and 3-5 are reversed.                    
          The Itoh patent does not cure the deficiencies of Takikawa                  
          with respect to the rejection of claim 1.  Accordingly, the                 
          rejection of claim 2 is also reversed.                                      
                                     REVERSED                                         







                         JERRY SMITH                        )                         
                         Administrative      Patent Judge   )                         
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )  BOARD OF                    
          PATENT                                                                      
                         LEE E. BARRETT                )     APPEALS                  
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )       AND                    
                                                       )   INTERFERENCES              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         PARSHOTAM S. LALL                  )                         
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              



                                        - 8 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007