Ex parte CHAINER et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-3742                                                        
          Application 08/405,561                                                      

          objected to, for depending upon a rejected base claim.1                     
          Claims 2 and 5 have been canceled.                                          
               Appellants’ invention relates to micro sized data storage              
          disks or microfiles.  As disclosed on page 3 of the                         
          specification, an integrated microfile includes a rotatably                 
          supported magnetic disk, a movable access head, and a                       
          micromotor with a rotor and a stator.  More specifically,                   
          Appellants on                                                               
          page 5 of the specification and Fig. 4 show that the rotor 16               
          and the rotor poles 18 are integrated with the storage disk 12              
          in a one-piece assembly.  A stator 20 having stator poles 22                
          is formed around the rotor to drive the motor and rotate the                
          disk so that data storage sectors may be selectively accessed.              
               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as                    
          follows:                                                                    
               1.   A microfile comprising:                                           
               a rotatably supported storage disk for storing data;                   
               a micromotor for rotating said disk and including a rotor              
          integrated with said disk in a one-piece assembly, and also                 
          including a stator, said rotor having a plurality of magnetic               
          rotor poles extending radially outwardly from a perimeter                   

               1The Examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 11                 
          through 23 in the answer.                                                   
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007