Ex parte FUJISAWA - Page 1



                                                       Paper No. 31                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              Ex parte HIROTOSHI FUJISAWA                             
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 1997-3960                               
                              Application 08/249,700                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                    _______________                                   
          Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and BARRY, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                                                                     
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 12 and 14, which                    
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.  An                 
          amendment after final rejection was filed on March 31, 1997 in              
          response to a new ground of rejection set forth in the examiner’s           
          answer.  This amendment was entered by the examiner.                        


                                            1                                         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007