Ex parte FUJISAWA - Page 5



          Appeal No. 1997-3960                                                        
          Application 08/249,700                                                      


          at the claimed invention.  Such reason must stem from some                  
          teaching, suggestion or implication in the prior art as a whole             
          or knowledge generally available to one having ordinary skill in            
          the art.  Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044,              
          1051, 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1438 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825           
          (1988); Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Delta Resins & Refractories, Inc.,             
          776 F.2d 281, 293, 227 USPQ 657, 664 (Fed. Cir. 1985), cert.                
          denied, 475 U.S. 1017 (1986); ACS Hosp. Sys., Inc. v. Montefiore            
          Hosp.,                                                                      
          732 F.2d 1572, 1577, 221 USPQ 929, 933 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  These             
          showings by the examiner are an essential part of complying with            
          the burden of presenting a prima facie case of obviousness.  Note           
          In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed.              
          Cir. 1992).  If that burden is met, the burden then shifts to the           
          applicant to overcome the prima facie case with argument and/or             
          evidence.  Obviousness is then determined on the basis of the               
          evidence as a whole and the relative persuasiveness of the                  
          arguments.  See Id.;                                                        
          In re Hedges, 783 F.2d 1038, 1039, 228 USPQ 685, 686 (Fed. Cir.             
          1986); In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785, 788               
          (Fed. Cir. 1984); and In re Rinehart, 531 F.2d 1048, 1052, 189              
          USPQ 143, 147 (CCPA 1976).  Only those arguments actually made by           

                                            5                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007