Ex parte YAMASAKI - Page 1




                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law             
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                              

                                                                                            Paper No. 16                           


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        

                                                           __________                                                              

                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                           __________                                                              

                                                 Ex parte KOICHI YAMASAKI                                                          
                                                           __________                                                              

                                                     Appeal No. 1997-3996                                                          
                                                     Application 08/519,952                                                        
                                                          ___________                                                              

                                                 HEARD: JANUARY 11, 2000                                                           
                                                          ___________                                                              

               Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               

               FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             

                       Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 18,                  

               which constitute all of the pending claims in the case before us.                                                   

                                                        BACKGROUND                                                                 

                       The subject matter on appeal is directed to a power source circuit for a portable electronic                

               device (i.e., TV, VTR, or phone) having a triangle wave voltage oscillator and a fixed-frequency,                   

                                                                1                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007