Ex parte KOCSIS et al. - Page 3




              Appeal No. 98-0192                                                                           3                
              Application No. 08/572,281                                                                                    


              least one ceramic part which requires lubrication, which operates at a temperature of at                      
              least 250/C at the top ring reversal position, or which is powered by natural gas,                            
              comprising supplying to such an engine a lubricant composition comprising:                                    

                     (a) a major amount of an oil of lubricating viscosity, and                                             

                     (b) a minor amount of a salt of an alkylene-linked polyaromatic molecule, the                          
              aromatic moieties of which comprise at least one hydrocarbyl-substituted phenol and at                        
              least one carboxy phenol, said salt being soluble in the oil of lubricating viscosity at the                  
              operating temperature of the engine.                                                                          

                                           THE REFERENCES OF RECORD                                                         


              As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following references.                                

              Blystone et al.                      5,356,546                    Oct. 18, 1994                               
              Bardasz et al.                       5,458,794                    Oct. 17, 1995                               
              (filed Sept. 30, 1993)                                                                                        
                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                           
                                                   THE REJECTIONS                                                           

              Claims 1 through 69 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                          

              unpatentable over Blystone alone or in combination with Bardasz.                                              

                                                   OPINION                                                                  

                     We have carefully considered all of the arguments advanced by appellants and the                       

              examiner and agree with the examiner that the aforementioned rejection of claims 1                            

              through 66 and 69 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is well founded.  Accordingly, we sustain                          

              this rejection.  We agree with the appellants that the aforementioned rejection of claims                     

              67 and 68 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is not well founded.  Accordingly, we do not                               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007