THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte JOSEPH LIN
__________________
Appeal No. 98-0594
Application 08/615,4611
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 12-15. Claims 1-11 have
been canceled. No claim has been allowed. The real party in
interest is Seagate Technologies, Inc.
References relied on by the Examiner
Tsujino 5,315,464 May, 24, 1994
Jordan 4,505,238 March 19, 1985
1
Application for patent filed March 14, 1996.
According to the appellant, it is a continuation of
application 08/284,368, filed August 2, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007