Appeal No. 1998-1509
Application No. 07/811,509
The Mandl reference is of no help in providing for the
deficiencies of Launey as Mandl does not suggest any such set
of addressable control functions, Mandl being employed by the
examiner for its teaching of an “energy save” mode.
Accordingly, the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1,
3-6, 12-16, 25-28 and 30-32 under 35 U.S.C. 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
ERROL A. KRASS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007