Ex parte DODT et al. - Page 3




               Appeal No. 1998-2017                                                                                              
               Application No. 08/802,216                                                                                        



               Yokota et al. (Yokota)        5,452,279                     Sep. 19, 1995                                         
                                                                    (filed Mar. 19, 1993)                                        
               PCT Publication WO 93/20647 (Moss), published Oct. 14, 1993                                                       

                      Claims 13-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                               
               Bar in view of Yokota and Moss.                                                                                   
                      We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 18) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper                            
               No. 28) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No. 27) and the                        
               Reply Brief (Paper No. 31) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand                        
               rejected.                                                                                                         


                                                           OPINION                                                               
                      The examiner bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case of                                  
               unpatentability.  If that burden is met, the burden of coming forward with evidence or                            
               argument shifts to the applicant.  After evidence or argument is submitted by the applicant                       
               in response, patentability is determined on the totality of the record, by a preponderance of                     
               evidence with due consideration to persuasiveness of argument.  In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d                           
               1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992).                                                                





                                                              -3-                                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007