THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NICOLAS HAHN DE BYKHOVETZ,
and SAID CARTO
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-2057
Application 08/331,541
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 18 through 35, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.1
1As the appellants correctly point out at page 1 of the brief, the only
claims in the application are claims 18 through 35. There is no claim 36 in
the application. Thus, the references to claim 36 in the final rejection and
in the notice of appeal are obvious errors.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007