Ex parte SEKI - Page 3




                     Appeal No. 1998-2064                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/710,551                                                                                                                                            


                     and an upper housing portion 3 of the driving device that                                                                                                         
                     allows                                                                                                                                                            




                     axial movement of the female thread member relative to the                                                                                                        
                     housing portions of the driving device, in combination with                                                                                                       
                     impact absorbing springs 41 between the lower surface of the                                                                                                      
                     female thread member and a lower housing portion 5 of the                                                                                                         
                     driving device.  According to appellant, this arrangement                                                                                                         
                     improves the operation of the device by absorbing impact                                                                                                          
                     forces that tend to damage the workpiece.                                                                                                                         
                                A copy of the appealed claims can be found in an appendix                                                                                              
                     to appellant’s brief.                                                                                                                                             
                                The references of record relied upon by the examiner in                                                                                                
                     support of a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                                                                                                                 
                                Markus       1                             0,305,762                                             Mar.  8, 1989                                         
                     (European)                                                                                                                                                        
                                Becker                                     0,394,925                                             Oct. 31, 1990                                         
                     (European)                                                                                                                                                        


                                1 Our understanding of this German language reference is                                                                                               
                     derived from a translation prepared on behalf of the Patent                                                                                                       
                     and Trademark Office.  A copy of the translation is attached                                                                                                      
                     to this opinion.                                                                                                                                                  
                                                                                          3                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007