THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte ANTHONY J. SUPPELSA, RICHARD J. KOLCZ,
CARL M. THIELK, and BRANKO AVANIC
__________________
Appeal No. 1998-3045
Application 08/612,6931
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and LEE and MEDLEY,
Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of
appellants’ claims 1-15. The real party in interest is Motorola, Inc.
References relied on by the Examiner
Tanaka et al. Patent No. 4,725,925 Feb. 16, 1988
(Tanaka)
Neumann et al. Patent No. 5,122,620 Jun. 16, 1992
(Neumann)
1
Application for patent filed March 8, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007