Appeal No. 1999-0113 Page 13
Application No. 08/472,321
we shall also sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 15 and 16 as being unpatentable over
Swann in view of Dubach.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 5 and 6 as unpatentable
over Dubach, claims 5-10, 50 and 51 as unpatentable over Orford in view of Dubach, claims
12-14 as unpatentable over Orford in view of Dubach and Suarez and claims 15 and 16 as
unpatentable over Swann in view of Dubach is affirmed; however, the examiner's decision to
reject claim 49 as unpatentable over Orford in view of Dubach and claim 11 as unpatentable
over Orford in view of Dubach and Suarez is reversed.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007