Ex parte BOGERT et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1999-0272                                      Page 10           
          Application No. 08/605,212                                                  


          USPQ2d 1057, 1059 (Fed. Cir. 1993) citing In re Zletz, 893                  
          F.2d 319, 321, 13 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989).                       


               The American Heritage Dictionary, Second College Edition,              
          (1982) defines "drive" as "[t]he means or apparatus for                     
          transmitting motion or power to a machine or from one machine               
          part to another."  It is our view that this definition is the               
          broadest reasonable meaning of "drive" as it would be                       
          understood by one of ordinary skill in the art without                      
          importing limitations from the specification since the written              
          description contained in the appellants' specification does                 
          not provide any other definition for "drive."                               


               Ward's gears 56 and 58 and Gurevich's cranks 26 and 27                 
          driven by gearwheels 29 do transmit motion or power from one                
          machine part to another.  Thus, it is our conclusion that the               
          above-noted "separate powered drive" limitation claim 16 is                 
          readable on Ward's gears 56 and 58 and Gurevich's cranks 26                 
          and 27 driven by gearwheels 29.  Accordingly, we conclude that              
          the claimed subject matter is taught by Ward and Gurevich.                  









Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007