Ex parte BOGERT et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1999-0272                                                                                     Page 2                        
                 Application No. 08/605,212                                                                                                             


                          We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                                                            


                                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                           
                          The appellants' invention relates to an apparatus for the                                                                     
                 severing of glass gobs from one or more strands of molten                                                                              
                 glass (claims 7, 8, 10, 12 and 14); an apparatus for severing                                                                          
                 glass gobs from at least one strand of molten glass (claims                                                                            
                 16, 17, 18 and 22); and an apparatus for moving at least one                                                                           
                 pair of cooperating shear blades to sever glass gobs from at                                                                           
                 least one strand of molten glass (claims 24 and 25).  A copy                                                                           
                 of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the                                                                         
                 appellants' brief.                                                                                                                     


                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Ward, Jr. (Ward)                                      4,015,967                                    April 5,                            
                 1977                                                                                                                                   
                 Gurevich et al. (Gurevich)                            SU 1435548        2                 Nov.  7, 1988                                



                          2In determining the teachings of Gurevich, we will rely                                                                       
                 on the translation provided by the USPTO.  A copy of the                                                                               
                 translation is attached for the appellants' convenience.                                                                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007