Ex parte BOGERT et al. - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                                       
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                           

                                                                                                                    Paper No. 29                        

                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                        Ex parte HERMANN BOGERT and GERHARD GEISEL                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1999-0272                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/605,212                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 22, 24 and                                                                           
                 25.  Claims 9, 11, 13, 15, 19, 20, 21 and 23 have been                                                                                 
                 objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim.  Claims 1                                                                           
                 to 6 have been canceled.                   1                                                                                           



                          1Claims 7, 13, 14, 16, 17 and 24 were amended subsequent                                                                      
                 to the final rejection.                                                                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007